DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-18 Thread Sean Hunt
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 1:51 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: 7649 scshunt 2 I always thought these already ratifie I wrote this proposal, not scshunt; I don't think this affects validity of distribution. Unfortunately it does, sigh. It's an essential parameter so it must

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-17 Thread omd
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Alex Smith callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: We used to have a class of switches that didn't need reporting on, to stop it being technically illegal not to report the judgement of every old CFJ, or the AI of every old proposal, or the like, in such cases

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 13/5/14, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: 7649   scshunt                  2   I always thought these already ratifie AGAINST; this doesn't allow for implicit switches, and so I think it might cause all the old CFJs

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: On 13 May 2014 17:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I vote: 7644   Yally                    1   Make the Birthday Holiday line up with FIR What's this do?  Oh, haha, grow needles maybe? Genuine typo but I'm leaving it.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-13 Thread Sean Hunt
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: 7656 scshunt 1 Clairty AGAINST until precedent is cleared up. increase should be replaced by simply change if its meant to go both directions. If the precedent is that you can't increase by a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: 7656 scshunt 1 Clairty AGAINST until precedent is cleared up. increase should be replaced by simply change if its meant to go both directions.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-13 Thread omd
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: 7649 scshunt 2 I always thought these already ratifie AGAINST; this doesn't allow for implicit switches, and so I think it might cause all the old CFJs to spontaneously unjudge themselves, or something

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-13 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 13 May 2014 17:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I vote: 7644 Yally1 Make the Birthday Holiday line up with FIR What's this do?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7643-7658

2014-05-13 Thread Sprocklem
On 2014-05-13 13:44, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: On 13 May 2014 17:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I vote: 7644 Yally1 Make the Birthday Holiday line up with FIR What's this do? The FLR has {{{ [CFJ 1885 (called 26 January 2008): AGAINT is a variant