Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-26 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I still do that in my Monthly report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 26, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> I vote as

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-25 Thread Aris Merchant
The proposal numbers don't have anything to do with what is being decided. That is dependent upon the proposal identity, not the ID numbers. A proposal can be distributed without an ID number (and often is with expedition or the new campaign proposals). -Aris On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:19 AM,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-25 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I vote as follows: > >> ID Author(s)AI TitlePender Pend >> fee >> --- >> 7973* Aris 1.0 Sky

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-21 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 00:20 Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >> 7880* ATMunn, [5] 1.0 [6] Alexis 1 > AP > > AGAINST. If you deserve it, claim it right away. > > Three of the reward conditions may be

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-21 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: 7880* ATMunn, [5] 1.0 [6] Alexis 1 AP AGAINST. If you deserve it, claim it right away. Three of the reward conditions may be triggered by _other_ people's actions, so this is not always possible, and Agora has a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-20 Thread VJ Rada
Ya I was just going to give myself a win and put Smash Mouth All Star in the ruleset for a while for that exact reason: an absurd dictatorship would be disastrous at this point. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-20 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > >>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > >> to > >>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. > >> which is

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-20 Thread VJ Rada
>AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. >to > 6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. >which is obvious nonsense. DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again. Alright show's over boys

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-19 Thread Alexis Hunt
Thankfully the expedition only needs to back to last year, when the ruleset was ratified. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, 20:40 VJ Rada, wrote: > I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that > nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-19 Thread VJ Rada
I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos. You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

2017-11-19 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: 7974* V.J. Rada3.0 [2] Really minor fixes V.J. Rada 1 AP FOR. Note that some of these may be Rulekeepor typos; I will do my best to investigate and determine which ones are. Some of the changes are equivalent to "replace text A with