Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

I bid 26 Shinies On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I bid 25 shinies because why not. > > -- > Trigon > > On Nov 1, 2017 11:26 PM, "Cuddle Beam" wrote: > >> I bid 21 Shinies. >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, VJ Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

I bid 25 shinies because why not. -- Trigon On Nov 1, 2017 11:26 PM, "Cuddle Beam" wrote: > I bid 21 Shinies. > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> It's rather silly that it's possible to tie the auction and stop any >> sale from

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

Maybe I'm just a huge scrub, sorry. I noticed that one of the replies was by default a-b and a-d, which is weird. I must have deleted the wrong one. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Nov 1, 2017, at 10:40 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 10:40 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Yeah, that makes sense. I missed that. Obviously the whole "bid a > billion shinies to stop the auction" plan still works, but it is > illegal now so that's good. What’s going on with your replies? You’ve sent a number of

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] November Estate Auction

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 10:28 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > It's rather silly that it's possible to tie the auction and stop any > sale from happening. Perhaps bids should be made secretly to the > Surveyor. I believe only increasing bids are effective now: > During an auction, any