On 27 Oct 2008, at 19:56, Ed Murphy wrote:
And what scam was that, then?
He says he's going to try it again, so I doubt he'll tell you.
--
ehird
BobTHJ wrote:
> Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
> proposal. This was intended to be part of a scam that I later realized
> wouldn't work (and in truth had little to do with the PBA).
And what scam was that, then?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:29, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
>> proposal. This was intended to be part of a scam that I later realized
>> wouldn't wor
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
> proposal. This was intended to be part of a scam that I later realized
> wouldn't work (and in truth had little to do with the PBA).
What was it?
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:03 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:52, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 27 Oct 2008, at 17:48, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > Then vote against the mental health act.
> I thought it had no effect? (due to Power)?
It can't modify contracts, but
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:52, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct 2008, at 17:48, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
>> proposal.
>
>
> Then vote against the mental health act.
>
I thought it had no effect? (due to Power)?
On 27 Oct 2008, at 17:48, Roger Hicks wrote:
Just to clarify: I really don't want to see the demise of the PBA by
proposal.
Then vote against the mental health act.
--
ehird
7 matches
Mail list logo
