DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6086-6108

2009-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: 6099 D 1 2.0 Pavitra Clean up the deregistration mess AGAINT As usual, this is invalid due to ambiguity (CFJs 1260-61).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6086-6108

2009-02-14 Thread comex
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: comex wrote: 6099 D 1 2.0 Pavitra Clean up the deregistration mess AGAINT As usual, this is invalid due to ambiguity (CFJs 1260-61). Really? I seem to remember you've usually treated it as AGAINST.