2009/3/8 Benjamin Schultz :
>> 6122 D 1 3.0 Goethe Nothing Original
>
> FOR... let's see what e can do with it.
We are ruining his scam excellently.
Taral wrote:
>> Proposal 6137 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=0) by Tiger
>> Ambassador Anarchy
>
> FORx3
Your caste is only Delta.
Pavitra wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Pavitra wrote:
>>
6128 D 1 3.0 Goethe Conditional Upgrade
>>> AGAINT
>> Ineffective as usual, as I'm sure you're aware of the relevant history.
>
> FOR.
NttPF
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>>> 6128 D 1 3.0 Goethe Conditional Upgrade
>> AGAINT
>
> Ineffective as usual, as I'm sure you're aware of the relevant history.
FOR.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Wooble wrote:
>> 6128 D 1 3.0 Goethe Conditional Upgrade
> AGAINST if the Revolution doesn't arrive during the voting period, FOR
> otherwise.
Ambiguous (thus invalid); "the Revolution" could reasonably have any
number of referents.
Pavitra wrote:
>> 6128 D 1 3.0 Goethe Conditional Upgrade
> AGAINT
Ineffective as usual, as I'm sure you're aware of the relevant history.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
>> 8xFOR. I wrote this.
>
> By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
> successfully removed the unwanted one.
Sorry, the one me
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:26 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
> > 8xFOR. I wrote this.
>
> By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
> successfully removed the unwanted one.
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
> 8xFOR. I wrote this.
By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
successfully removed the unwanted one.
This may or may not be reverse psychology.
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 20:11 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >> 6137 O 0 1.0 Tiger Ambassador Anarchy
> > AGAINST (probably invalid)
>
> Why? Did I fail to use correct adoption index again?
No, because ehird probably has a voting limit of 0 on ordinary
proposals. So it's a valid prop
>> 6137 O 0 1.0 Tiger Ambassador Anarchy
> AGAINST (probably invalid)
Why? Did I fail to use correct adoption index again?
11 matches
Mail list logo
