snail wrote:
I vote as follows in the prime minister election: [snail]
This vote was ineffective, as voting was not yet open.
reminder that there's also an election for regkeepor, with only 1 vote
on it (and PSS's VP=0 vote).
also fact: if the elections were resolved now, G would be the herald,
I would be the PM, o. would be the ADoP, and 天火狐 would be the
reportor.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
I know, it is more a meaningful vote that an actually effective vote.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> wrote:
>>
>> I endorse G.
"I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office election"
FYI I'm not resolving this.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all
> should vote for me, folks.
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen
I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all
should vote for me, folks.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:51 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister,
>> Herald, ADoP. and R
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
> > I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
> > what I've written?
>
> It'd be pretty bad
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
> I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
> what I've written?
It'd be pretty bad for the game if a person's actual intentions (which
Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
what I've written?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most
It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most votes
*now*) or a conditional vote (whomever has the most votes at the end of the
voting period). If I had to guess, I'd go with the first one.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I vote for whoever has the most votes
Could work as a good place for ads too.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Josh T wrote:
> I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if
> deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I
> intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for
I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if
deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I
intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for articles if
they wish to submit them and I choose to include them.
Please find a proto-newspap
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
> you can take reportor
that's a useless job - unwanted by me. :P
you can take reportor
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
>> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister,
>> Herald, ADoP. and Reportor.
>>
>> I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the new Herald. The vote
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo