On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was expecting a bit of restraint - deregistering is not particularly novel
> or
> unique or funny. Things like what ais523 and Murphy did were what I was
> hoping for.
Unfortunately it's kind of classic. This isn't reall
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hoist by eir own petard
Ah, thank you. Just the phrase I was looking for.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps. Although, to be honest, what did you expect to happen when
> you posted those pledges? You could have constrained them to something
> minor, like votes.
I was expecting a bit of restraint - deregistering is not particularly novel or
unique or funny.
Taral wrote:
>AGAINSTx11 (can power-1 proposals register people?)
Yes, but it's not clear that this one would. If it said "ehird is hereby
registered." then it certainly would have the effect of registering em.
What it actually says is "ehird registers.", which expands to "ehird
registers emself.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 5573 O0 1Teh Cltohe comex, as e is while burning in the fire...
>> AGAINSTx11 (can power-1 proposals register people?)
>
> Dunno. Would you vote for a version that would work
2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 5573 O0 1Teh Cltohe comex, as e is while burning in the fire...
> AGAINSTx11 (can power-1 proposals register people?)
Dunno. Would you vote for a version that would work if the current one doesn't?
6 matches
Mail list logo
