On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
By the way, should I retract this proposal and resubmit it with a
clause installing me? I mean, I'm planning to take the office anyway.
I'll take your word for it this time... but I'm watching you... :P
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
Proposal, The Resistance, AI 1.5:
Create a rule with power 1.5, titled Gothur and Yufel:
I'm not voting for any new office without a firm commitment, perhaps
By the way, should I retract this proposal and resubmit it with a
clause installing me? I mean, I'm planning to take the office anyway.
--the Warrigal
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal, The Resistance, AI 1.5:
Create a rule with power 1.5, titled Gothur and Yufel:
This seems like a good use case for the currently-passing ephemeral
(power1) rule proposal. The Patent Title bit requires 1.5,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
Proposal, The Resistance, AI 1.5:
Create a rule with power 1.5, titled Gothur and Yufel:
I'm not voting for any new office without a firm commitment, perhaps
proposal-enforced, that the proposer be the officeholder for at least
90 days (unless
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
Proposal, The Resistance, AI 1.5:
Create a rule with power 1.5, titled Gothur and Yufel:
I'm not voting for any new office without a firm commitment, perhaps
6 matches
Mail list logo
