On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ, disqualifying Tanner L. Swett: In the message quoted in
evidence, Tanner L. Swett gained at least one erg.
I don't think you've assigned this CFJ yet. Do you intend to?
—Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 15:39 -0400, omd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign from all offices and become supine. I describe my becoming
supine just now as earning me 2*3^35,000 farads; for this action, I
award myself 3^35,000 ergs. I pay fees
omd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Alternatively, they could have been given chaotic numbers like 1401
through 1401, so that the orderly numbers would still roughly
reflect the number of distinct statements.
That's roughly what you
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign from all offices and become supine. I describe my becoming
supine just now as earning me 2*3^35,000 farads; for this action, I
award myself 3^35,000 ergs. I pay fees to destroy all my rests, then
pay fees to destroy
omd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I resign from all offices and become supine. I describe my becoming
supine just now as earning me 2*3^35,000 farads; for this action, I
award myself 3^35,000 ergs. I pay fees to destroy all my rests, then
pay
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Actually, they all fail, by the precedent of CFJ 1774.
Counterargument: the disparity of effort between Tanner announcing
I perform asset-related action $BIGNUM times and the relevant
officer recording that e did so is
omd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Actually, they all fail, by the precedent of CFJ 1774.
Counterargument: Â the disparity of effort between Tanner announcing
I perform asset-related action $BIGNUM times and the relevant
officer recording that
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Alternatively, they could have been given chaotic numbers like 1401
through 1401, so that the orderly numbers would still roughly
reflect the number of distinct statements.
That's roughly what you tried, isn't it?
8 matches
Mail list logo
