Charles Walker wrote:
proposal:
{
SHOULD
AI 3, II 2
In Rule 2152, Mother, May I?, replace point 7 with:
{{
7. SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the described
action, the full implications of failing to perform it SHALL be understood
and carefully
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
After having carefully considered the consequences of doing so,
including the fact that it opens up Agora to multiple easy wins; that it
reveals a serious flaw in the rules; and that it allows me to win, for
the duration of this message I will fail to
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
If the proposal entitled Fix recursive SHOULD was adopted at the same
time as this proposal, it is of no effect.
This is an interesting, orthogonal note. Assuming the referent of it
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 07:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
If the proposal entitled Fix recursive SHOULD was adopted at the same
time as this proposal, it is of no effect.
This is an
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 00:53 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
After having carefully considered the consequences of doing so,
including the fact that it opens up Agora to multiple easy wins; that it
reveals a serious flaw in the rules; and that it allows me to win, for
the duration of this message I
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 07:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
If the proposal entitled Fix recursive SHOULD was adopted at the same
time as this
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
After having carefully considered the consequences of doing so,
including the fact that it opens up Agora to multiple easy wins; that it
reveals a serious flaw in the rules; and that it allows me to win, for
the duration of
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
But I believe this is incorrect, because this is not a pragmatic
nomic: it's a platonic nomic with some explicit elements of
pragmatism.
Perhaps a typical example of the fallacy of I Think It Is, Therefore It
Has Become So?
2009/3/14 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
Perhaps a typical example of the fallacy of I Think It Is, Therefore It
Has Become So?
That has plagued Agora for a long time?
Goethe wrote:
Yah, that would be fine for the same practical effect, although it couldn't
wholly undo things - if the previous one changed a rule and then a later
one put it back, at the very least an amendment number would change. It
would be possible to go further and retroactively reset
10 matches
Mail list logo
