On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:46 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I support.
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR x1)
Note that you're
Tiger wrote:
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR x1)
You're not an eligible voter for proposal 6072, as you weren't a player
at
Murphy wrote:
Tiger wrote:
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR x1)
You're not an eligible voter for proposal 6072, as you weren't
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:57 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Tiger wrote:
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Tiger wrote:
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR x1)
You're not an
Tiger wrote:
Ah. Then I don't think I'm an eligible voter for any of the proposals
I have voted on. Should I say something in Business about this, or
just leave it be and just see them not being counted?
The latter is fine; in practice, I've been controlling the AFO for the
purpose of
ais523 wrote:
The AFO should notice that you aren't an eligible voter on them, just as
it should notice that Wooble was only Beta not Alpha at the start of the
voting period.
I did, but only because e voted before eir caste was increased. I need
to revise the database to retain a dated
7 matches
Mail list logo
