On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Josh T wrote:
>
>> I issue a Yellow Card to the Superintendent due to eir tardiness in
>> publishing the September Monthly Agency report.
>
> I believe that there is presently no such player.
>
> That leaves me
On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Josh T wrote:
> I issue a Yellow Card to the Superintendent due to eir tardiness in
> publishing the September Monthly Agency report.
I believe that there is presently no such player.
That leaves me in an awkward situation, as I must both card someone and call
th
I do suppose that makes my attempt to issue the Superintendent a card is
quite moot. Carry on.
天火狐
On 11 September 2017 at 08:02, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The office of Superintendent is empty.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
The office of Superintendent is empty.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Josh T wrote:
>
> I issue a Yellow Card to the Superintendent due to eir tardiness in
> publishing the September Monthly Agency report. Eir apology m
Yes but the cards are still there, even if the pink slip was issued.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> True, but the cleanup could get rather nasty.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:10 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > The way that would b
True, but the cleanup could get rather nasty.
-Aris
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:10 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> The way that would be solved is the arbitor issuing the referee a pink
> slip and them being removed from office. There are safeguards.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
The way that would be solved is the arbitor issuing the referee a pink
slip and them being removed from office. There are safeguards.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Spread out to other people I mean. Like, RATTATATATATATATATA everyone's got
> yellow cards
>
> On Mon, Sep 11
Spread out to other people I mean. Like, RATTATATATATATATATA everyone's got
yellow cards
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:07 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> issuing multiple cards at once does nothing tho...
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > becuz i dont want a gatling gun ref up my but
issuing multiple cards at once does nothing tho...
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> becuz i dont want a gatling gun ref up my butt
>
> I create the following Proposal:
>
> Title: No 10-Card Combo
> Content:
>
> Amend "The Referee CANNOT Point eir Finger or impose Summary Judg
not a legal proposal, no title. also why?
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> The Referee could go full Gatling gun and during Sun-Mon, give 5+5=10 Yellow
> Cards to people via Summary Judgement lol.
>
> I create the following Proposal:
>
> Amend "The Referee CANNOT Point eir Fi
Rule 2479 would be superfluous if other people could issue them.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:02 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Yeah I think you're right.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> No, I don't believe it does. CANNOT doesn't generally imply CAN under
>> all circumstances
Yeah I think you're right.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> No, I don't believe it does. CANNOT doesn't generally imply CAN under
> all circumstances not listed.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:58 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by a
No, I don't believe it does. CANNOT doesn't generally imply CAN under
all circumstances not listed.
-Aris
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:58 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement". Does this
> imply that they can be issued that way?
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at
"Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement". Does this
imply that they can be issued that way?
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Nope. See rule 2125. Rule 2426 defines cards and card issuing, and it
> also puts some restrictions on when someone CANNOT use a ca
Nope. See rule 2125. Rule 2426 defines cards and card issuing, and it
also puts some restrictions on when someone CANNOT use a card, but it
never says players CAN do so. Rules 2478 and 2479 give carding
authority to the referee under circumstances, but again, never say
that players CAN do so. Unles
Ooh ooh I could issue everyone but myself a yellow card JUST before
resolving these elections! That would be a fun way to sew up the PM
election.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I believe everyone has authority. Reading the rules, there's nothing
> restricting it to the referee.
I believe everyone has authority. Reading the rules, there's nothing
restricting it to the referee. The referee's role just seems to be
publishing reports and judging finger-points.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Pardon me, but where do the rules give you the authority to
Pardon me, but where do the rules give you the authority to issue a card?
-Aris
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Josh T wrote:
> I issue a Yellow Card to the Superintendent due to eir tardiness in
> publishing the September Monthly Agency report. Eir apology must contain the
> following words:
>
I was given a Yellow Card for being tardy on a CFJ (I dunno if there are
other cases though)
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:36 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I believe this card is inappropriate because lateness is usually given
> a green card. "A person SHALL NOT issue a Card unless:
> the reason is appropria
I believe this card is inappropriate because lateness is usually given
a green card. "A person SHALL NOT issue a Card unless:
the reason is appropriate for the type of Card being issued;".
I point my finger at 天火狐
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Josh T wrote:
> I issue a Yellow Card to the Supe
20 matches
Mail list logo
