Pavitra wrote:
Given that the intent is so obvious, it's more reasonable to parse it
as all first-class players [each individually] have at least 14.
There's still legitimate ambiguity regarding awarding props
simultaneously/serially: if the prop holdings are {5, 10, 15} before the
change,
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
Do props actually exist? I can't find them in the online version of the
ruleset anywhere, I thought
On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
I think that the intent is
{
For some constant K, award K props to each first class player; choose
the
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
Do props actually exist? I can't find them in the
Pavitra wrote:
On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
I think that the intent is
{
For some constant K, award K props to each first class player;
On 08/24/2012 03:31 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
I think that the intent is
{
For some
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Pavitra wrote:
Given that the intent is so obvious, it's more reasonable to parse it
as all first-class players [each individually] have at least 14.
There's still legitimate ambiguity regarding awarding props
simultaneously/serially: if the prop holdings are {5,
7 matches
Mail list logo
