Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

2017-06-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:53 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > "Official" gratuitous arguments have less impact on the initial judgement > > than they used to, now that the Arbitor doesn't assemble case logs before > > assigning cases, so each individual Judge

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

2017-06-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:53 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > "Official" gratuitous arguments have less impact on the initial judgement > than they used to, now that the Arbitor doesn't assemble case logs before > assigning cases, so each individual Judge has to go looking for them even > if they're

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

2017-06-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 08:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith > k> wrote: > > > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora- > > > discussion: > > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

2017-06-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 08:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith k> wrote: > > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora- > > discussion: > >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

2017-06-21 Thread grok (caleb vines)
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora-discussion: > ) ooh, do I need to TTttPF gratuitous arguments into BUS? Since they