On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Actually, I take this back. What I told everyone was that the proposal
> in question is AI-1 and every rule in question was power-2. So the
> proposal causes no changes whatsoever to occur, but not for the reason
> that Wooble cites. -G.
Th
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > > *6759 OP1 1.0 coppro Ill-conceived
> >
> > Rule 1698 may make this change not occur; we now have all decisions
> > Ordinary by default, with no
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > *6759 OP1 1.0 coppro Ill-conceived
>
> Rule 1698 may make this change not occur; we now have all decisions
> Ordinary by default, with no defined voting limits on ordinary
> decisions and n
On 08/02/2010 07:20 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
*6759 OP1 1.0 coppro Ill-conceived
Rule 1698 may make this change not occur; we now have all decisions
Ordinary by default, with no defined voting limits on ordinary
decisions and no way to
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> *6759 OP1 1.0 coppro Ill-conceived
Rule 1698 may make this change not occur; we now have all decisions
Ordinary by default, with no defined voting limits on ordinary
decisions and no way to make decisions democratic.
5 matches
Mail list logo
