On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I transfer 5VP to Taral
>
> You too, Taral.
Bah, hardly. I have significant investments at stake.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 6 Nov 2008, at 03:08, Roger Hicks wrote:
Whatever the case, I think Wooble and ehird's mousetrap was perfectly
fair. Perhaps the mousetrapped should have their CFJ rights preserved
(including equity) but beyond that I hold myself responsible for not
better monitoring the Protection Racket's am
Regarding all this, I expect that it would be appropriate to add a new
R101 right, along the lines of "Every player/person has the right to
formally petition the people of Agora for redress of grievances." The
trappee could submit a proposal (the formal petition) to terminate the
contract, and the
ais523 wrote:
> although
> it used to be impossible to use power of attorney to deregister someone
> (although you could do anything else with it as long as you didn't
> violate R101), the modern version seems to allow deregistration (for
> instance when ehird was ripped apart by walnuts). (Note t
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is probably worth mentioning that some of
> the relevant language (to do with Executors) is still left in rule 2170,
> although it no longer seems to have an effect on the rules.
Actually, R2170's definition of Executor is
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 08:14 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 2246 ==
>
> CFJ 2245 was retracted.
>
>
Very long proto-judge's-arguments that don't even come to a
6 matches
Mail list logo
