Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 remanded to Taral by Wooble (AFFIRM), Rodlen (AFFIRM but NttPF), Tiger

2009-05-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:42 -0700, Taral wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2480a Appeal 2480a Panelist:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 remanded to Taral by Wooble (AFFIRM), Rodlen (AFFIRM but NttPF), Tiger

2009-05-26 Thread Ed Murphy
Alex Smith wrote: We really really need legislation in the area of act-on-behalf... Proto-proto: A claim to act on behalf of another person constitutes a self-ratifying claim that it is authorized by contract.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 remanded to Taral by Wooble (AFFIRM), Rodlen (AFFIRM but NttPF), Tiger

2009-05-26 Thread comex
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Alex Smith wrote: We really really need legislation in the area of act-on-behalf... Proto-proto:  A claim to act on behalf of another person constitutes a self-ratifying claim that it is authorized by contract. I'm not

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 remanded to Taral by Wooble (AFFIRM), Rodlen (AFFIRM but NttPF), Tiger

2009-05-25 Thread Taral
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2480a  Appeal 2480a   Panelist:                               Wooble Panelist: