Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-12 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 9 May 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:     The message quoted in evidence began a coup. In other news, I announce the ceremonial shilling of the palace. Hrm, I totally don't know here.  I personally saw the message when it

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-10 Thread comex
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Hrm, I totally don't know here.  I personally saw the message when it was first sent, didn't catch the typo at all, and assumed it worked, so there's evidence it was clear enough to someone, and the typo was trivial,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 10 May 2010, comex wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Hrm, I totally don't know here.  I personally saw the message when it was first sent, didn't catch the typo at all, and assumed it worked, so there's evidence it was clear enough to

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-09 Thread Sean Hunt
On 05/09/2010 10:28 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: It seems reasonable to me that, depending on the eventual judgement on CFJ 2793, there are no judges well-qualified to be assigned to CFJ 2793, as the only standing players are ais523 (Justiciar) comex (Chief Whip) coppro (disqualified)

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-09 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: On 05/09/2010 10:28 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: It seems reasonable to me that, depending on the eventual judgement on CFJ 2793, there are no judges well-qualified to be assigned to CFJ 2793, as the only standing players are ais523 (Justiciar) comex (Chief Whip) coppro

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2793 assigned to G.

2010-05-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: The message quoted in evidence began a coup. In other news, I announce the ceremonial shilling of the palace. Hrm, I totally don't know here. I personally saw the message when it was first sent, didn't catch the typo at all, and assumed it worked, so