On 6/19/2020 5:31 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> This portion of the judge's arguments is very interesting. It sounds almost
> more like the sort of thing one would expect to hear in the caller's
> arguments. But that can't be right, now can it? ;)
>
> -Aris
>
gotcha thanks
>
> --
>
> Judge Murphy's Arguments:
>
> Per my judgement of CFJ 3843, Bazinga isn't an asset, thus the statement
> is overly hypothetical.
>
> DISMISS.
>
> For completeness, even if Bazinga was an asset, the statement would
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
