I vote as follows:

On May 27, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> ID    Author(s)           AI    Title
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8178  Trigon              3.0   n’t

AGAINST. Or ain’tn’t, if you prefer. I don’t generally mind contractions, but 
adding more ways to say the same thing seems unnecessary given the number of 
synonyms that are already defined.

> 8179  D Margaux, Aris     2.0   Intent is Important (v1.1)

AGAINST. Been the Referee. Would have hated this - and I wrote a fair number of 
referee calls that invoked intent. If you want Refereeing subjected to a lot of 
CFJs and generally bogged down, impose a subjective constraint on it like this 
as a matter of law rather than a matter of policy. At least as things are now, 
if someone’s refereeing unfairly, we can solve it by deposing them.

-o

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to