Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 4958-4969

2007-05-09 Thread Zefram
Michael Slone wrote: I comment that this does not look like the intended proposal, since it repeats proposal 4962. That's correct. The initial part up to and including {{{ is not part of the proposal that I submitted. -zefram

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 4958-4969

2007-05-09 Thread Roger Hicks
I vote as follows: 4958 | Improved Turn Radius| Murphy| 1 | 30Apr07 | O PRESENT 4959 | Bears as Threats| OscarMeyr | 1 | 30Apr07 | O AGAINST 4960 | Patch of the Return of t... | OscarMeyr | 1 | 01May07 | O FOR 4961 | no VCs for Democratic pr... |

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 4958-4969

2007-05-09 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: I vote as follows: Not to the Public Forum, hence ineffective (Rule 683 requires votes to be published, Rule 478 defines publishing). This also seems like a good opportunity to clarify TTttPF = this time to the Public Forum.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 4958-4969

2007-05-09 Thread Roger Hicks
Thanks for the info! On 5/9/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BobTHJ wrote: I vote as follows: Not to the Public Forum, hence ineffective (Rule 683 requires votes to be published, Rule 478 defines publishing). This also seems like a good opportunity to clarify TTttPF = this time to