Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Does fungibility break this?
>
> No, because capacitors are not a currency.
Huh, and neither are ergs and fans. Was that intentional? Unlike
cards, there's no obvious reason in the existing ruleset to avoid
making any of t
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Does fungibility break this?
No, because capacitors are not a currency.
—Tanner L. Swett
Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal wrote:
>>> So, what shall we do first? I guess I can draft a proposal to create
>>> an accumulable currency that you can turn ergs into. What benefits can
>>> we provide for holding
Warrigal wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Capacitative Accumulability", AI = 2, II
> = 1, Tiger as coauthor:
>
> {Amend Rule 2289 by appending to the first paragraph, "Polarisation is
> a capacitor switch with values Charging (default) and Discharging. Any
> player CAN by announcement destroy
On 8 September 2010 14:08, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal wrote:
>>> So, what shall we do first? I guess I can draft a proposal to create
>>> an accumulable currency that you can turn ergs into. What benefits can
Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
> > the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
>
> Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
> power. Ho
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
> power. How do you propose that this be accomplished?
You're probably going to need to propose watts as a currency. Or
perhaps microwatts, considering the tiny amounts of energy
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
> the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
power. How do you propose that this b
Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
> > I think that could be accomplished by making capacitors a bit more
> > accumulable. Are they tradeable, for example? I'd say up the price for
> > creating them out of ergs, and instead make it so that they don't
> > aut
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I think that could be accomplished by making capacitors a bit more
> accumulable. Are they tradeable, for example? I'd say up the price for
> creating them out of ergs, and instead make it so that they don't
> automatically go back to erg fo
On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I am, though I'm not sure of what I have to offer the FSCN.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Keba wrote:
>> I would like to join, as I like team play.
>
> Well, then, you're in. I hereby i
On 09/02/2010 08:05 PM, Warrigal wrote:
For that matter, what does Agora as a whole think, since FSCN
currently has no special power at all?
—Co-Founder Tanner L. Swett
My response was posted to #really-a-cow.
-coppro
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> Well, then, you're in. I hereby inceive the FSCN, composed of me,
> Sgeo, Tiger, and Keba. We should probably draft a charter at some
> point, but that's not necessary just yet.
On behalf of the Agoran Illuminati, I transfer 5 chaos to the FSCN.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I am, though I'm not sure of what I have to offer the FSCN.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Keba wrote:
> I would like to join, as I like team play.
Well, then, you're in. I hereby inceive the FSCN, composed of me,
Sgeo, Tiger, and Keba.
Warrigal wrote:
> Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
> FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
> disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
> accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
> allowin
On 1 September 2010 15:08, Warrigal wrote:
> Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
> FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
> disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
> accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power
Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
allowing players to accumulate po
17 matches
Mail list logo
