You could also increase welcome packages over time or tie winning
conditions and such to the amount of time playing or have
inflation-controlled currencies independent for each player based off of
usage and receipt of the currencies. I think that the first or second
would be easiest by the final on
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> Inflation: the game could actually just be a fun game in itself. Like
> "race to 1 billion" type thing.
In real-life economies, controlled inflation can be fine.
In standard boardgames, everyone racing in an inflationary economy is fine.
It ends up being "e
Will "not" be exempt, not that it matters since the contract doesn't
exist now.
On 2017-11-21 22:07, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Why will it be exempt?
On 11/21/2017 04:24 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:14 AM, Telnaior wrote:
On 2017-11-21 19:57, Owen Jacobson wr
Why will it be exempt?
On 11/21/2017 04:24 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:14 AM, Telnaior wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-11-21 19:57, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>> Incidentally, I think the distribution rules, fiddly though they are, are
>>> actually working as intended, but I want to get ot
>I'm going to transfer that shiny to Aris as an apology for the blatant
>plagiarism.
We've already found (informally, but w/ no noted dissent) that the
phrasing "I'm going to do this" or "I will do this" is insufficient
for a by announcement action.
Also, I dread to think what my D&D alignment i
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:00 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Inflation: the game could actually just be a fun game in itself. Like
> "race to 1 billion" type thing.
I knew I used bignums for a reason.
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Inflation: the game could actually just be a fun game in itself. Like
"race to 1 billion" type thing.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> 2. Is fairly granular/divisible (I mean, we count our monthly salaries
>> and cost
On Nov 19, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 2. Is fairly granular/divisible (I mean, we count our monthly salaries
> and costs in 10s or 100s of units, not 1s). So people can use small
> fractions of "pend units" or "CFJ units" to trade and auctions can turn
> on small bid differences.
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
> On 11/19/2017 1:57 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> >
> > [ No more shinies, everybody! ]
[...]
> > and the minimum bid is 1 shiny.
> You got rid of shinies, so you should specify the currency it is conducted in
> and change the minimum bid to that currency
9 matches
Mail list logo
