On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I mean that supporters are not allowed to perform actions restricted to
specific players. For example, only the correct officer can resolve an
officer-only intent. I'm pretty sure it still works if it's generally "any
player CAN with 2 support".
Oh.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:16 Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> > This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
>
> If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know
> that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know
that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due to the phrasing of
the rule. See also my proto message.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, 01:45 Ørjan Johansen, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> >
> >> I support and do so.
> >>
> >
> > This doesn't work as
I made a proto fix:
{{{
Fix Dependent Actions (AI=3)
Amend rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) by:
1. replacing
A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform
an action by
by
A rule which purports to allow a person to perform an action by
[Dependent on
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote:
I support and do so.
This doesn't work as you don't hold the office, however, with o, Aris, and
Gaelan's support, I do so.
I'm pretty sure Gaelan's action is _intended_ to work by
6 matches
Mail list logo