Re: DIS: Agora XX: Attn Speaker: Please re-check votes on 344!

2013-06-27 Thread Steven Gardner
Given that Charles Walker did vote FOR, it doesn't matter if Chuck did vote AGAINST. On 28 June 2013 00:00, Steven Gardner steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote: Charles Walker voted FOR and his vote is not recorded; Speaker Fool may have confused the two 'Charles's. I've no record of Chuck voting

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Attn Speaker: Please re-check votes on 344!

2013-06-27 Thread Steven Gardner
Charles Walker voted FOR and his vote is not recorded; Speaker Fool may have confused the two 'Charles's. I've no record of Chuck voting on this proposal publically, but e may of course have done so privately. On 27 June 2013 23:48, games...@chuckcarroll.org wrote: Proposal 344 (Yally) passes

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Attn Speaker: Please re-check votes on 344!

2013-06-27 Thread games_na
Per my usual custom, I voted via private email to the Speaker (and my votes were correctly recorded for 342-343 and 345-347). Fool's report does have Walker listed as voting against, so if he just switched my vote with Walker's, that doesn't affect passage of the proposal, but does affect points.