Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
Will do. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:03 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > H. Dictator Alexis (and anyone else), I intend to annotate such changes > to > > the ruleset as follows: > > > > Amended(N) by Decree (Alexis), dd Month >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > H. Dictator Alexis (and anyone else), I intend to annotate such changes to > the ruleset as follows: > > Amended(N) by Decree (Alexis), dd Month > > Decrees would not be numbered. Let me know if this sounds suitable. Also, for future sanity,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Nov 6, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 > Owen Jacobson wrote: > >>> I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the >>> outcome would be ADOPTED.” >> >> If. >> >> It might be premature to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:16 PM ais523 wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 12:09 -0600, Nicholas Evans wrote: > > Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, > > instead of 7 calendar days? > Not sure about a CFJ, but it's been game custom for at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread ais523
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 12:09 -0600, Nicholas Evans wrote: > Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, > instead of 7 calendar days? Not sure about a CFJ, but it's been game custom for at least years, and probably decades. The relevant rule is 1023b, which states that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Nicholas Evans
Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, instead of 7 calendar days?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016, 10:53 nichdel wrote: > On 11/06/2016 04:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 > > Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > >>> I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the > >>> outcome would be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread nichdel
On 11/06/2016 04:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 Owen Jacobson wrote: I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the outcome would be ADOPTED.” If. It might be premature to declare victory, since proposal 7821 is NOT yet