Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

I still do that in my Monthly report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 26, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> I vote as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 00:20 Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >> 7880* ATMunn, [5] 1.0 [6] Alexis 1 > AP > > AGAINST. If you deserve it, claim it right away. > > Three of the reward conditions may be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

Ya I was just going to give myself a win and put Smash Mouth All Star in the ruleset for a while for that exact reason: an absurd dictatorship would be disastrous at this point. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > >>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > >> to > >>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. > >> which is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

Thankfully the expedition only needs to back to last year, when the ruleset was ratified. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, 20:40 VJ Rada, wrote: > I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that > nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos. You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes,