This one's a really good idea in principle: last time we tried it, someone
who believed in free proposals whipped up a "anyone can act on my behalf
to support creating/pending a proposal" contract. Not sure if it's worth
making exceptions to act-on-behalf for such things or if that becomes too
That really wasn't the point to take away from that message, but okay.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 11:39 ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk <
ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 11:37 -0600, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > Even simpler: players can submit proposals but a different person has
> > to
On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 11:37 -0600, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Even simpler: players can submit proposals but a different person has
> to pend them, after checking for mistakes. Oh, and it has to be an
> active player.
Given that pending isn't in the rules at the moment, the dependent
action version
Even simpler: players can submit proposals but a different person has to
pend them, after checking for mistakes. Oh, and it has to be an active
player.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 11:32 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Proto: create proposals with 1 support. Supporter SHOULD check the
> proposal against [list
Proto: create proposals with 1 support. Supporter SHOULD check the proposal
against [list of common mistakes we keep somewhere]
Gaelan
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> When I wrote Paydays (I think I drafted that text), I purposefully wanted
> Speaker to be a
When I wrote Paydays (I think I drafted that text), I purposefully wanted
Speaker to be a sinecure with a salary, as a perk for winning.
Aside: I really hate the lack of pending, and just plopping proposals in
the pool without review (including mine). Watching the proposals in the
last
6 matches
Mail list logo
