On 3/28/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, this may be trivially true due to Rule 2034.
Murphy,
Since I was running out of time in which to judge, I had to submit a
version of the judgement which did not take into account your argument
regarding rule 2034. You may wish to
Maud wrote:
On 3/28/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, this may be trivially true due to Rule 2034.
If I understand the argument you intend, this would depend on Agorans
agreeing not to challenge the vote collector's announcement of
results.
Yes, that's what I had in mind.
Maud wrote:
On 3/23/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assign CFJ 1608 to Maud. Text is here:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2007-January/002784.html
I (proto-)judge the statement of CFJ 1608 to be TRUE.
Actually, this may be trivially true due
On 3/28/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, this may be trivially true due to Rule 2034.
If I understand the argument you intend, this would depend on Agorans
agreeing not to challenge the vote collector's announcement of
results. Admittedly, it might seem bizarre for someone to
4 matches
Mail list logo
