Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Rulekeepor's notes on Proposals 7698-7710

2014-11-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, omd wrote: On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Eritivus eriti...@gmail.com wrote: I must not understand this comment. Surely the problem wasn't that there was no specified order for the individual replacements? It would seem very odd to require such an order. Agora is

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Rulekeepor's notes on Proposals 7698-7710

2014-11-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, omd wrote: On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Eritivus eriti...@gmail.com wrote: I must not understand this comment. Surely the problem wasn't that there was no specified order for the individual replacements? It would seem

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Rulekeepor's notes on Proposals 7698-7710

2014-11-02 Thread omd
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Eritivus eriti...@gmail.com wrote: I must not understand this comment. Surely the problem wasn't that there was no specified order for the individual replacements? It would seem very odd to require such an order. Agora is nothing if not odd. Rule 105 states: