Yay, wrong forum.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RFC 12: Every player has a number of AP, which is initially 7 and
never more than 7. Every midnight UTC, every player gets an AP, unless
this would put them above 7 AP. Subgame actions generally require a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 13:34, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could record this in the database as three separate assigns (similar
to appeal panels, a holdover from the old justices / appellate judges
BobTHJ wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 13:34, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could record this in the database as three separate assigns (similar
to appeal panels, a holdover from the old justices /
I wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to amend the Vote Market by replacing
section 13 with this text:
13. A Sell Ticket to vote in a certain manner on an Agoran decision
also constitutes conditionally voting to endorse the filler a
number of times equal to one's voting
On Friday 10 October 2008 11:39:02 pm Taral wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, without Objection, to amend The Note Exchange as
follows:
I object
[Allowing transfer of Markers to oneself shouldn't be horribly
abusable (as allowing
Which game is that?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:26 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay, wrong forum.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RFC 12: Every player has a number of AP, which is initially 7 and
never more than 7. Every midnight UTC, every player gets an
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Allowing transfer of Markers to oneself shouldn't be horribly
abusable (as allowing transfer of Markers from oneself to others
would be), and could make it easier to set up useful
redemptions.]
Nonsense.
How do you
On 11 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Taral wrote:
Which game is that?
http://groups.google.com/group/nomic-217
--
ehird
ehird wrote:
On 11 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Taral wrote:
Which game is that?
http://groups.google.com/group/nomic-217
H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows:
PerlNomic - Friendly
Normish - Friendly
Nomic 217 - Neutral
Civ3Democracy - Neutral
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows:
PerlNomic - Friendly
Normish - Friendly
Nomic 217 - Neutral
Civ3Democracy - Neutral
NooPolis - Neutral
Dragonomic- Abandoned
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Embassies
Amend Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions) by appending this text:
An embassy is a partnership player whose contract designates
You mean registered partnership?
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Saturday 11 October 2008 03:38:32 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
On 11 Oct 2008, at 21:05, Ed Murphy wrote:
H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows:
Normish - Friendly
Nomic 217 - Neutral
I agree, but with Normish - Neutral and Nomic 217 - Friendly.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Oct 2008, at 23:28, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement, barring Ivan Hope:
If Ivan Hope takes actions in the PerlNomic game which cause em to
become an active player of PerlNomic, e
On 11 Oct 2008, at 23:56, ihope wrote:
That is not relevant to the CFJ.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
In your opinion.
I was merely noting that I had actually asked you this already.
--
ehird
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I harvest 869 from these crops, the power of a recently amended rule
(mutated to power 2), for 6 random crops. Yay for high seed ratios!
Funny how this is coming up so often now. I bumped it from 1x to 3x
ages ago
BobTHJ wrote:
I vote SELL(2VP - PRESENT) on the above proposals.
Why'd you bother joining the Llama Contract if you're just going to
keep doing this?
ehird wrote:
On 11 Oct 2008, at 21:05, Ed Murphy wrote:
H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows:
PerlNomic - Friendly
Normish - Friendly
Nomic 217 - Neutral
Civ3Democracy - Neutral
NooPolis - Neutral
Dragonomic- Abandoned
I
Ivan Hope wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Embassies
Amend Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions) by appending this text:
An embassy is a partnership player whose contract designates
You mean registered partnership?
Yes, thank you.
Taral wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I harvest 869 from these crops, the power of a recently amended rule
(mutated to power 2), for 6 random crops. Yay for high seed ratios!
Funny how this is coming up so often now. I bumped it from 1x to
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:36:05 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
Taral wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I harvest 869 from these crops, the power of a recently amended
rule (mutated to power 2), for 6 random crops. Yay for high
seed ratios!
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 18:26, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
I vote SELL(2VP - PRESENT) on the above proposals.
Why'd you bother joining the Llama Contract if you're just going to
keep doing this?
At the moment I'm too pressed for time to consider each proposal and
give
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 17:57, Ben Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the Vote Market if I am not already a party to it. (I thought I
was, but the Notary's report seems to disagree.)
You already are (according to the VM report)
I withdraw 3 VP for 268 chits.
281 chits, I think, and you
Pavitra wrote:
I submit a proposal, AI=1, II=1, Creative contest switching:
{
Amend rule 2136 (Contests) by replacing the text:
Any player CAN flip the contestmaster of a public contract
without 3 objections, except if doing so would cause a player to
be contestmaster of
23 matches
Mail list logo
