H. Insulator, I believe this is the current status of Rests; I'm
removing the non-note-related parts from the Conductor's report:
Rests
-
comex - 6
ehird - 5
Murphy - 12
pikhq - 2
Quazie - 2
root - 1
Sgeo - 2
Taral - 2
w1n5t0n - 2
All other persons have no Rests.
History
---
Fri 9 Jan
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
The following proposals are made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties. Said duties have not been performed within the tme limit, so I
hereby deputise for the office regarding this duty.
Proposal: Repeal
Geoffrey Spear wrote
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
The following proposals are made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties. Said duties have not been performed within the tme limit, so I
hereby deputise for the office regarding this duty.
Proposal: Repeal R2147
Repeal Rule 2147
On 2/9/09, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I realised that after posting. Is there anything I could do officially
to fix this? Post another message adding to that one, posting a new
one declaring that one void, or nothing at all?
I believe you can validly retract those
From the thread going on in Business right now:
---
On 2/9/09, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I contest the last 5 of these. Punishing em 6 times for what is
essentially the same inaction is manifestly unjust, and may break R101.
Alright, then I submit the following NoVs:
(snip)
---
The
2009/2/9 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
From the thread going on in Business right now:
---
On 2/9/09, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I contest the last 5 of these. Punishing em 6 times for what is
essentially the same inaction is manifestly unjust, and may break R101.
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 20:17 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
From the thread going on in Business right now:
---
On 2/9/09, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I contest the last 5 of these. Punishing em 6 times for what is
essentially the same inaction is manifestly unjust, and may break
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org is the default reply-to address for the
Agora mailing lists. It's something of a bug at your end, in that your
mail client's showing the reply-to rather than the From as the author.
There's probably some way to change that
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No it has to do with showing names/aliases. That's the name that shows up
in the archives themselves when no name outside of the actual address is
supplied.
Look at the archive list's address shown on comex's last two
2009/2/9 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No it has to do with showing names/aliases. That's the name that shows up
in the archives themselves when no name outside of the actual address is
supplied.
Look at the archive list's
ais523 wrote:
Murphy wrote:
{{{
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the eventual judge of these
CFJs for giving em eight cases at once.
}}}
Did this ever happen? (A reminder seems to make more sense than an
equity case for something like this...)
I've already given you one this
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any Notice of Violation
alleging a rule violation prior to the adoption of this rule
is invalid. If this rule has existed for at least 200 days,
then any player CAN (by announcement) cause it to
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Fri 13 Feb 18:15:40 comex +2 02/09:001 (if uncontested)
02/09:001 18:15:40 comex Murphy 18682CFJ 2339
Hmm?
comex wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Fri 13 Feb 18:15:40 comex +2 02/09:001 (if uncontested)
02/09:001 18:15:40 comex Murphy 18682CFJ 2339
Hmm?
Sorry, copied the wrong name. Fixed in draft.
I entered a rotation into the database, but forgot to add the
comment before assigning 2363. (I blame my head cold.) The net
effect of this is that I'm sitting instead of standing; all other
sitting players would be sitting anyway, due to recent assignments.
15 matches
Mail list logo