On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
The archives should be molded to fit the needs of the game, not the game
molded to fit the needs of the archives.
I would agree with that if there seemed to be any point in using plain
text attachments.
Charles Walker wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
The archives should be molded to fit the needs of the game, not the
game molded to fit the needs of the archives.
I would agree with that if there
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
Oh, sorry. I didn't know that.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
There was in that circumstance. The puzzle required tab characters to
work properly and they were being dropped. As a result, it had to be
sent as an attachment.
--
C-walker
On May 10, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting
period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
IIRC, proposals are Agoran decisions too. So it only fails in part.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
yet.
Alex Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 10:20 -0400, Quazie wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
6273 Quick-and-dirty-fixD 3.0 3 coppro
I endorse murphy and goethe if ey agree.
they. Spivak doesn't change plurals, for
I'm just wondering what the majority of people would prefer as far as
initiating elections and other IADoP actions - should I distribute them as
soon as they can or should I wait and make distributions weekly? The first
option will resolve the decisions faster but the second decision may get
more
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I'm just wondering what the majority of people would prefer as far as
initiating elections and other IADoP actions - should I distribute them
as soon as they can or should I wait and make distributions weekly? The
first option will resolve the decisions faster but the
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On May 10, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
IIRC, proposals are Agoran decisions too. So it only fails in part.
-
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On May 10, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its voting
period.
This fails; you can't vote PRESENT for elections.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com
mailto:ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On May 10, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision currently in its
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 11:23 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I was away longer than I expected.
I come Off Hold. I sit up. I vote PRESENCE on every Agoran Decision
currently in its voting period.
You have a voting limit of 0 on those, because they were initiated while
you were inactive.
It isn't, at least until the rule has changed.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 10, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I terminate the pledge Quazie made on 1 May this year as obsolete.
--
ais523
Notary
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Points awards in this message are due to the Points Party.
I award 5 x-points and 5 y-points to each of: BobTHJ, Tiger, ehird,
Murphy, Taral, Rodlen, and Sgeo.
I flip the contestmaster of the Points Party to Murphy.
--
Alex Smith wrote:
Points awards in this message are due to the Points Party.
I award 5 x-points and 5 y-points to each of: BobTHJ, Tiger, ehird,
Murphy, Taral, Rodlen, and Sgeo.
I flip the contestmaster of the Points Party to Murphy.
Fails, as they weren't parties to the Points Party at the
Sent from my iPhone
On May 10, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 15:44 -0400, Quazie wrote:
I had joined this contest. So had HP2, but I don't think that
matters
as far as points go.
Ah yes, you did; sorry, that's just an oversight due to trying
Quazie wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 10, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 15:44 -0400, Quazie wrote:
I had joined this contest. So had HP2, but I don't think that matters
as far as points go.
Ah yes, you did; sorry, that's just an
H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b)
still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been
purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID.
Sean Hunt wrote:
--- Previous Report ---
Apr 28, 2009: To correct mistakes found by above CFJ, the following are
flipped:
j - Beta
cmealerjr - Gamma
Wooble - Gamma
BobTHJ - Delta
woggle - Delta
Murphy - Epsilon
Yally - Epsilon
Apr 28, 2009:
coppro wrote:
H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b)
still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been
purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID.
Except that R2198 takes precedence over it.
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b)
still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been
purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID.
Except that R2198 takes precedence over it.
wonderful
coppro wrote:
Number: 6275
Title: Privelege of the Champion
Ineffective, you already assigned 6275 (when you apparently meant to
assign 6273). I suggest assigning 6273 to this proposal instead.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2520
== CFJ 2520 ==
A pledge that Quazie made on 5 My this year still exists.
24 matches
Mail list logo
