On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note: Arnold Bros (est. 1905) and coppro voted in conditional circularity.
Votes: 10
Quorum: 11
FAILED QUORUM is selected by Agora.
I love how this was conveniently
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of circularity
would have made it above quorum) is a sign of malice.
The fact that e retracted
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
You are correct. However, the answer to Do we need to consider the
difference between regular and Agoran days? is yes.
The only difference is that regular days start at midnight local time,
which gives at least 6 different
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of circularity
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
or perhaps
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
You are correct. However, the answer to Do we need to consider the
difference between regular and Agoran days? is yes.
The only difference is that regular days start at midnight
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event
are 24 hours from the event. -G.
That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
days and Agoran days. An Agoran day is 24 hours,
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event
are 24 hours from the event. -G.
That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
days and Agoran days.
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event
are 24 hours from the event. -G.
That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
{{
The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
thesis
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
office.
The votes are as follows:
Wooble (10): comex, Human
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
{{
The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to be higher than necessary.
I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
I object.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to be
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
The votes for Janitor are as follows:
In all currently open elections, I vote for the first candidate (in
alphabetical order) who has at least as
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
This ambiguous. Alphabetical order by what? Election title? Nickname?
Nicknames aren't even officially tracked.
Bah, spoilsport. :D
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if
one has voted in the previous week.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if
Why?
On 2009-05-16, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's
Oh god call me when it's over
On 2009-05-16, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
No, too dangerous the other way. Better way is to penalize
for repeated non-votes (e.g. current proposal to make non-voters
inactive). Better would be rests for active players who don't
vote
20 matches
Mail list logo
