Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 08:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith k> wrote: > > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora- > > discussion: > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Pre-Resolution of Victory Election

On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 05:38 -0700, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Let me try again, I hereby ratify the following document without > objection: {{Votes on any attempt to initiate a Victory Election are > votes on the most recent successful attempt.}} You forgot "intend", and you're

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora-discussion: > ) ooh, do I need to TTttPF gratuitous arguments into BUS? Since they

DIS: sorry & cloudflare

Last night, when I changed the DNS for agoranomic.org to point to GitHub Pages, I forgot to change the MX record so that my server would continue to receive mail. I knew I had to do that, but it slipped my mind... Thus the lists were down for several hours, until this morning when I saw an email

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: 3527 judgement

V.J Rada wrote: > I also point the finger at gaelan for being late on two CFJs and the SLR > (twice, I think) These would be CFJs 3520 and 3521, both assigned on June 6th, 2017: 14 days prior to the Finger-Pointing above. Rule 591 (“Delivering Judgements”) states, in part: > When a CFJ is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pointless (has this been tried before?)

I agree with this interpretation, but I find nowhere that suggests that payments must only be legal values of the balance switch. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 20, 2017, at 11:24 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Jun 20,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 08:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith > k> wrote: > > > (Also relevant, the gratuitous arguments by grok to agora- > > > discussion: > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3524 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

On Jun 20, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I find CFJ 3524 FALSE, as the ruleset clearly and undebatebly specifies in > plain terms that any previous holding of a White Ribbon under any ruleset > precludes the action that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: It's been a while.

> On Jun 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > oof, also my apologies for the walls of text. i'm playing with gmail's > plain text editor and the input box doesn't automatically line break > for me. those paragraphs are...denser than expected. I see nothing

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pointless (has this been tried before?)

> On Jun 20, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: >> Why not just require that shinies may only be given in positive >> integers? Or that any entity that would give shinies may not give >> fractional parts of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3524 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

It seems to me to be deceptive because it seemed that soon after others observed it, he had known that he had previously received the award. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:59 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:53 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > "Official" gratuitous arguments have less impact on the initial judgement > than they used to, now that the Arbitor doesn't assemble case logs before > assigning cases, so each individual Judge has to go looking for them even > if they're

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3529 assigned to Sprocklem

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:53 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > "Official" gratuitous arguments have less impact on the initial judgement > > than they used to, now that the Arbitor doesn't assemble case logs before > > assigning cases, so each individual Judge