twg wrote:
Rule 869/44 indicates that a dead organism is not a person, because it is not capable of
thinking. So if an organism who was a player died, e would cease to be a person and COULD
NOT be a player any longer. But this is not the same as "deregistering",
because that is the act of
D. Margaux wrote:
On Oct 31, 2018, at 12:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I CFJ: "Gaelan transferred a coin to me today."
This is CFJ 3678. I assign it to Murphy.
Rule 1742 (Contracts) doesn't require agreeing to a contract to be
public, just intent that it be binding and rules-governed.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, ATMunn wrote:
For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second I
missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP report.
Hm, I don't recall doing anything out of the ordinary for that message.
I deleted the copy I got back from
For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second
I missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP
report.
On 11/4/2018 8:39 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
[twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
[twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though I don't think it
was effective; see my recent CFJ]
COE: E did, see my gratuitous argument.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
CFJ, barring twg: twg is Referee.
Caller's arguments:
* Oct 30, D. Margaux resigned Referee
* Nov 1, twg published the Referee's report but did not announce that e
was deputising (as required by Rule 2160 item #5)
Gratuitous argument:
E had just
I'm pretty sure this is the wrong place to add this. Doesn't it make
more sense higher up in the rule?
-Aris
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:38 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I create the following proposal: {
> Title: Independence
> AI: 3
> Author: Gaelan
>
> Prepend “Such an action is known as a
7 matches
Mail list logo
