Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vote

2018-11-29 Thread ATMunn

I submitted unconditional votes :)

On 11/29/2018 6:07 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:

It would be nice if some more people could submit unconditional votes. I like 
unconditional votes, they're remarkably easy to count.

-twg


‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 8:36 PM, D. Margaux  
wrote:


Oh, interesting. Thanks for this.

I change my vote on proposal 8136 to:

{

ENDORSE the most recent player to join
the Living Zombie contract, if and only if one or more new players have
joined that contract before the end of the voting period on the proposal;

Otherwise, AGAINST.

}


On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:


On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
I vote AGAINST the proposal referenced below.
I change my vote on that proposal to ENDORSE the most recent player to join
the Living Zombie contract, if and only if one or more new players have
joined that contract before the end of the voting period on that proposal.


My interpretation of these actions is that the change entirely replaces the 
AGAINST vote, whether or not the condition within happens.
The less plausible reading (which I think game custom would not prefer unless 
you did it more unambiguously) is that it's a conditional action to create a 
vote, not to create a conditional vote, in which case the change is presumably 
ineffective because the condition is inextricable at this time.
For what I suspect you want (unless you were trying to misguide), you need to 
make a vote that contains the conditional branching inside it.
Greetings,
Ørjan.





Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vote

2018-11-29 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
It would be nice if some more people could submit unconditional votes. I like 
unconditional votes, they're remarkably easy to count.

-twg


‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 8:36 PM, D. Margaux  
wrote:

> Oh, interesting. Thanks for this.
>
> I change my vote on proposal 8136 to:
>
> {
>
> ENDORSE the most recent player to join
> the Living Zombie contract, if and only if one or more new players have
> joined that contract before the end of the voting period on the proposal;
>
> Otherwise, AGAINST.
>
> }
>
> > On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> > > I vote AGAINST the proposal referenced below.
> > > I change my vote on that proposal to ENDORSE the most recent player to 
> > > join
> > > the Living Zombie contract, if and only if one or more new players have
> > > joined that contract before the end of the voting period on that proposal.
> >
> > My interpretation of these actions is that the change entirely replaces the 
> > AGAINST vote, whether or not the condition within happens.
> > The less plausible reading (which I think game custom would not prefer 
> > unless you did it more unambiguously) is that it's a conditional action to 
> > create a vote, not to create a conditional vote, in which case the change 
> > is presumably ineffective because the condition is inextricable at this 
> > time.
> > For what I suspect you want (unless you were trying to misguide), you need 
> > to make a vote that contains the conditional branching inside it.
> > Greetings,
> > Ørjan.




DIS: Re: BUS: Vote

2018-11-29 Thread Ørjan Johansen

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, D. Margaux wrote:


I vote AGAINST the proposal referenced below.

I change my vote on that proposal to ENDORSE the most recent player to join
the Living Zombie contract, if and only if one or more new players have
joined that contract before the end of the voting period on that proposal.


My interpretation of these actions is that the change entirely replaces 
the AGAINST vote, whether or not the condition within happens.


The less plausible reading (which I think game custom would not prefer 
unless you did it more unambiguously) is that it's a conditional action to 
create a vote, not to create a conditional vote, in which case the change 
is presumably ineffective because the condition is inextricable at this 
time.


For what I suspect you want (unless you were trying to misguide), you need 
to make a vote that contains the conditional branching inside it.


Greetings,
Ørjan.