The first sentence doesn't seem to make sense grammatically. "It is
considered ... when on the Agoran day e registered, if ..."
On 12/15/2018 3:09 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I am not sure if this is better, but whatever.
I submit the following proposal.
Title: Happy Birthday To You
Author:
oh crud, I need to judge this huh
On 12/15/2018 3:17 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
3690 called by twg 30 November 2018, assigned to ATMunn 2 December 2018: "G.
possesses at least one blot."
I remove ATMunn as judge of CFJ 3690. I assign this CFJ to ATMunn.
3691 called by Jacob Arduino 2
I think that's the exact same as the first one? Sorry if I wasn't clear.
I wasn't making a suggestion of what it should be changed to, I was
showing the weirdness.
I think just getting moving the "if" to before the "when" should work.
On 12/15/2018 4:22 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
pf
On
I retract the last one and submit this one:
Title: Happy Birthday To You
Author: Trigon
Coauthors: ATMunn
AI: 1
Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the text:
It is considered to be a player's Agoran Birthday when on the
Agoran day e registered, if it is
The traditional objection raised against this is that it encourages schemes
where one lists someone as a coauthor in exchange for them doing the same,
or the like. Do you have any ideas about how to stop that from happening?
-Aris
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:21 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I
No. I don't really actually care about this proposal. I just thought of
it on a whim and this week was slow.
On 12/15/18 2:56 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
The traditional objection raised against this is that it encourages schemes
where one lists someone as a coauthor in exchange for them doing
I thought that might have been the case. I wasn't sure what to say,
really, because I didn't want to make you look stupid, but I didn't want
the proposal to fail for no good reason :P
On 12/15/2018 5:02 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
ATMunn: I pasted the wrong thing and that's why it's the same.
Or, you could just say “on each anniversary of eir registration”, which is
a lot clearer, IMO.
-Aris
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM ATMunn wrote:
> I think that's the exact same as the first one? Sorry if I wasn't clear.
> I wasn't making a suggestion of what it should be changed to, I was
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
