Will type up my judgement later when I'm actually at home, but I am fairly
certain that the correct judgements are as follows:
CFJ 3722 - TRUE.
CFJ 3723 - FALSE.
CFJ 3724 - FALSE.
Aris, I believe that Proposal 8164 has become undistributed, so could you
please attempt to distribute it once
On 3/7/2019 6:57 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Aris, I believe that Proposal 8164 has become undistributed, so could you
> please attempt to distribute it once more as soon as possible, to
minimise > the time until it can take effect? (If I'm wrong, then the worst
that can > happen is that
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:36 AM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
> wrote:
>
> Ratification doesn't create paradoxes, though. The "compute what a
> retroactive change would do, then apply it" method of handling the
> change means that even if the cause of the ratification ends up being
> ratified
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 09:11 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> No, the paradox is something like:
>
> 1. Purported resolution message from Assessor;
> 2. CoE: this Proposal was never distributed so wasn't adopted.
>
> In terms of the truth value of the CoE, if it is true (wasn't adopted) then
> it
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 12:28 PM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
> wrote:
>
> The proposal /was/ distributed, though. It's just that its adoption
> changed the gamestate as though it wasn't.
>
> Denying the CoE constitutes a claim that the proposal was distributed.
> Well, it /was/ distributed! A
On 3/7/2019 6:20 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
Sorry all!
Naw, I was wondering if someone would manage to find a paradox win from this
- I looked for some self-cancelling dependent actions too, when we have
truly retroactive effects pending is the best time to go for it (I think
that type is the
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 07:31 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Another fix would be to simply for us all to not CoE a purported attempt to
> resolve the proposal (R2034) and also let the recent promotor's pool report
> self-ratify without the proposal in it - tho that may open the gate for more
> paradox
On 3/7/2019 8:36 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 07:31 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Another fix would be to simply for us all to not CoE a purported attempt to
resolve the proposal (R2034) and also let the recent promotor's pool report
self-ratify without the proposal
I'm sorry, our messages crossed. I think it will be trivially determinable from
my judgement to 3723 though.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, March 8, 2019 12:12 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I favor this case.
>
> On 3/7/2019 4:08 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> > I CoE this
On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:18 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>>
>> You've missed an important point which will be elaborated on in my judgement
>> of CFJ 3723. ATMunn did SPOOKILY distribute Proposal 8164, but it was
>> nevertheless in the proposal
On 3/7/2019 4:18 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I'm sorry, our messages crossed. I think it will be trivially determinable from
my judgement to 3723 though.
-twg
Well, it's trivial unless the judge holds onto it until the retroactive
effects go into effect :). No worries tho!
On 3/7/2019 4:08 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I CoE this attempted distribution because the proposal is not in the
proposal pool.
I'm not sure this did what you think it did. With this phrasing, the
document you've identified as in doubt (as per R2201) is the distribution
attempt. You gave the
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> You've missed an important point which will be elaborated on in my judgement
> of CFJ 3723. ATMunn did SPOOKILY distribute Proposal 8164, but it was
> nevertheless in the proposal pool when Aris redistributed it just now. I know
>
I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's
ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well!
You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report -
disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance
of R2202 you're
Well that is a very, very annoying oversight on my part. Nice catch.
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's
> ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well!
>
> You don't have to worry about the
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Well, it's trivial unless the judge holds onto it until the retroactive
> effects go into effect :).
ಠ_ಠ
Attached as individual text files. Please have a look and let me know what you
think...
-twg
=== CFJ 3724 ===
An Agoran Decision whether to adopt Proposal 8164 was
initiated and its outcome is ADOPTED.
17 matches
Mail list logo
