DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] The Agoran Directory (weekly report)

2022-01-31 Thread Sgeo via agora-discussion
My listed birthday should be 27 Jun 08 if I understand "birthday" correctly. My first registration is listed as "a Sgeo sgeoster at gmail.com27 Jun 08 31 Jul 11"

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] The Agoran Directory (weekly report)

2022-01-31 Thread ATMunn via agora-discussion
On 1/31/2022 12:27, Sgeo via agora-discussion wrote: My listed birthday should be 27 Jun 08 if I understand "birthday" correctly. My first registration is listed as "a Sgeo sgeoster at gmail.com27 Jun 08 31 Jul 11" My bad; I forgot that you were registered

DIS: Re: OFF: Deputy-[Arbitor] 3942 assigned to G. (Plus stuff)

2022-01-31 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: > I plan to flip my focus to Legacy. > > CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be destroyed. > > I temporarily deputize for the Arbitor to number the above CFJ #3942 and > assign it to G. > > I award

DIS: Re: OFF: Deputy-[Arbitor] 3942 assigned to G. (Plus stuff)

2022-01-31 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
oops hit "send" instead of "save draft" there - obviously unfinished lol On 1/31/2022 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: >> I plan to flip my focus to Legacy. >> >> CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be

Fwd: DIS: Re: OFF: Deputy-[Arbitor] 3942 assigned to G. (Plus stuff)

2022-01-31 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
ok here's an actually-finished proto judgement for consideration/comment: On 1/30/2022 11:10 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: > I plan to flip my focus to Legacy. > > CFJ: It is not possible under the current ruleset for a CFJ to be destroyed. > > I temporarily deputize for the

Re: Fwd: DIS: Re: OFF: Deputy-[Arbitor] 3942 assigned to G. (Plus stuff)

2022-01-31 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 1/31/22 17:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > The R2175/9 methods noted above cause something to "cease being a cfj". > But it's not clear that this "destroys" it as an "entity". It could > easily be called a "former cfj" and continue to exist. Furthermore, even > if a cfj is