Taral wrote:
This is a perfectly reasonable use of deem.
I find it difficult to imagine a reasonable use of deem. We should
avoid legal fictions as far as possible.
I read deemed like defined here.
Let's write it like defined too, then.
-zefram
Michael Norrish wrote:
Good. I feel that Zefram is objecting to the latter (but perhaps I am
mis-representing him, in which case I apologise),
I'm not objecting to the latter. Actually I do have an objection to
retroactive effects, which is what that one is, but that's a much smaller
objection
Zefram wrote:
Past CFJs do not have the status of Rules. They are meant to guide
play, but they cannot overrule a Rule if they conflict with one.
Rules are nothing without actors who obey them. And the same
actors interpret the judgements and their own authority as judges.
In that sense,
I wrote:
Only difference today is it takes a conspiracy
of several now (pass the proposal, or defend a judgement through
the appeals process).
Side note: the conspiracy was attempted and failed (CFJ 1346).
Bonus: the conspiracy used the word deemed.
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Grey Knight wrote:
Upon adoption of this proposal, Rule 2127 (Conditional Votes) is
repealed.
I hereby modify the Adoption Index of this proposal to 2 yellow
smarties.
I consider the attempt to modify the AI to fail. I'll have to
cross check the
On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:12 AM, Zefram wrote:
H. Promotor, I hereby submit the following proposal:
---
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Goethe is deemed to be a banana.
---
-zefram
You do realize that banana is not defined by the current Ruleset.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
Promotor
On Jan 28, 2007, at 11:13 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
As Speaker, I intend (without objection) to ratify each of the
following reports, posted by the noted players, on or about the
noted times:
* Herald, OscarMeyr, Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:49:07 -0500
I object; that report lists Zefram as a
On 1/29/07, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Grey Knight wrote:
Upon adoption of this proposal, Rule 2127 (Conditional Votes) is
repealed.
I hereby modify the Adoption Index of this proposal to 2 yellow
smarties.
I consider the attempt to
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 1/29/07, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Grey Knight wrote:
Upon adoption of this proposal, Rule 2127 (Conditional Votes) is
repealed.
I hereby modify the Adoption Index of this proposal to
On 1/30/07, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On each proposal in the group of proposals from proposal 4893 to proposal
4902 (excluding proposal 4896) I place a vote of FOR, unless without my FOR
vote any one of those proposals would not pass, in which case i place a vote
of PRESENCE.
Also if
10 matches
Mail list logo
