OscarMeyr wrote:
As long as Murphy is suggesting re-enacting Assessor, ADoP, and
Registrar, I've started thinking about re-enacting Scorekeepor,
points, and winning the game. I'll try to come up with some details
in a few days, particularly how to make it different from the last
time we
No rudeness intended, but Rulekeepor is the one office that requires an
experienced player. Rulekeepor Michael frequently found AI and other
problems with proposals put forward by some of our most seasoned
proposers.
I was not aware of this. From the rules it looked to me as if the
rulekeepor r
As long as Murphy is suggesting re-enacting Assessor, ADoP, and
Registrar, I've started thinking about re-enacting Scorekeepor,
points, and winning the game. I'll try to come up with some details
in a few days, particularly how to make it different from the last
time we had scores.
-
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Well, crap. Would anyone else (preferably already familiar with CVS)
>like to be Rulekeepor?
I'm up for it. I'm very familiar with CVS, but actually I'd like
to develop a more suitable database for the ruleset, like what Chuck
operated.
-zefram
4 matches
Mail list logo
