Re: DIS: BUS: Registration request

2007-05-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: Murphy wrote: I could swear that some variation or other of this issue has been judged in the past, but darned if I can find it. It was the opposite. The rules required that new players request registration. I tried to register by announcing I register. The CFJ was around

DIS: Call for Appeal

2007-05-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
CFJ 1630: We're all mad, here. Levi judged: I issue a judgement of DISMISSED as irrelevant to the rules. I call for appeal of CFJ 1630. The truth of CFJ 1630 tells us everything we need to know about the rules. -G. ps. :)

DIS: BUS: Registration request

2007-05-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: Thanks, it was CFJ 1266 (and was dismissed because it consisted of multiple statements). Oh yes, I'd forgotten an idiot newbie did that one. There's another CFJ right before/after. Look for one called by Blob, judged by Steve, with the CFJ statement written more concisely

Re: DIS: Call for Appeal

2007-05-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: CFJ 1630: We're all mad, here. Levi judged: I issue a judgement of DISMISSED as irrelevant to the rules. I call for appeal of CFJ 1630. The truth of CFJ 1630 tells us everything we need to know about the rules. Not to the PF, but it's not clear that Rule 1564 cares.

DIS: Re: BUS: Objection and Agreement

2007-05-01 Thread Zefram
Kerim Aydin wrote: I can't make an agreement with myself, We have mechanisms for this. It being a nomic, and all that. Proto-proposal: mostly-random judicial assignments {{{ Enact a rule titled Policy on Judicial Assignments with text: When the Clerk of the Courts must choose a Trial

DIS: Re: BUS: Two protos

2007-05-01 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Apr 30, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: Proto: VC reorganization Amend Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) to group together (1) all the ways to earn VCs and (2) all the ways to spend VCs. Or we could go back to using an officer's budget to control such items. How about it? I do have the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protection Racket

2007-05-01 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Apr 30, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Taral wrote: On 4/29/07, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Protection Racket To tell apart the two proposals, this proposal has been entered as Protection Racket (2). What, did the duplicate proposal rule get repealed too? I checked. It did

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protection Racket

2007-05-01 Thread Zefram
Benjamin Schultz wrote: Also, proposal titles are (AFAICT) at the promotor's discretion. Yes, they're completely unofficial at present. With all the action lately, I felt it may be useful to not distribute proposals with identical titles, as someone just might want to refer to a title by

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration request

2007-05-01 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: I hereby request permission to register under the name BobTHJ. Permission granted. Feel free to register to the public forum. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM Herald/Registrar OscarMeyr