2008/7/28 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://dotnomic.wikidot.com/
I don't personally have time to keep up with any forum-based nomics,
but I recommend that H. Ambassador BobTHJ recognize it per Rule 2185.
From their website:
I just saw mention of DotNomic in Agora's discussion list. I'd
Elliott Hird wrote:
This is an utterly preposterous judgement, as I was assisting in Goethe's
demonstration that failing speech acts were not illegal. It was not a threat
in any shape or form.
I concur that it was not a threat, but also note that threats to kill
do not violate the rules anyway.
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aha, I only have 2.2 (Zenith is still running RH9, and I still haven't
gotten around to buying its successor).
You can run it on rutian. :P
Note that the expression evaluates to the string '\x03', but I guess maybe,
since it's a single character, we can
2008/7/28 Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It was a deliberately false statement, and that *does* violate the rules.
-zefram
You and I *both* know that we disagree strongly on this point.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:11 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting sentence, as I'm not a player and therefore
have no Notes, and certainly won't have any in the next 72 hours.
Well, then appealing the case so there's a chance the sentence won't
go into effect until you
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== CFJ 2099 ==
I transfer all my crops to the PNP.
I find that that precedents in CFJs 2079-2080 are irrelevant to this
case; in those cases the announcement that
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally I would like to give ihope the benefit of the doubt, because
people should not be penalized for stating their opinions about a
controversy. But it is true that ihope used this statement,
unqualified, as arguments for a
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:35 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally I would like to give ihope the benefit of the doubt, because
people should not be penalized for stating their opinions about a
controversy. But it is true
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I think Appellant Zefram missed the point in CFJ
2086-2087... at the moment that I say I CFJ on xxx, it is true that
I am initiating a CFJ on xxx (and not true at any other time).
However, is it then true that CFJ xxx
tusho wrote:
You can run it on rutian. :P
What's that?
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's that?
eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *and* Star
Wars.
Which was all the
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
http://dotnomic.wikidot.com/
I don't personally have time to keep up with any forum-based nomics,
but I recommend that H. Ambassador BobTHJ recognize it per Rule 2185.
What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
participating in Agora at the moment...
Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could announce the recognition
would probably be a first good step...
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:26 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
participating in Agora at the moment...
Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could announce
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:50 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too late; I've already agreed to it on IRC.
Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
it.
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
it.
No it wasn't.
I can provide logs.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it wasn't.
I can provide logs.
Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Rule 2178:
Changes in the text or membership of a public contract do not
become effective until they are published.
The contract in question claimed to
On Monday 28 July 2008 03:06:35 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
There would
tusho wrote:
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's that?
eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *and* Star
ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:26 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
participating in Agora at the moment...
Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could
On Monday 28 July 2008 03:14:11 pm I wrote:
Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
There would superficially appear to be a conflict in this case
between its second-to-last and last paragraphs.
For reference:
If the text of a potential contract is published
On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:18 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I've configured Zenith to run nightly database dumps. The CotC DB
is ~3MB, the others are both under 50K. (Don't worry about DoSing
it; it's been serving ~2GB per month for a while now, due to hosting
a Java version of Chrononauts after the
OscarMeyr wrote:
Is the Java Chrononaughts still up? May I join?
http://zenith.homelinux.net/chrononauts/
No provision for network play, alas.
24 matches
Mail list logo
