Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 19 Dec 2004 08:48:23 Proposal 4628 expunges 1 Blot from Sir Toby. By the way, Proposal 4628 is archived at http://www.periware.org/agora/view_proposal.php?id=4628 -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 10 September 2008 03:13:06 am Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) > wrote: >> I register myself for Agora using the nickname "Sir Toby". >> >> For the benefit of the Registrar, I note that I was previously >> registered under the

DIS: Re: BUS: Monstrous CFJ

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:09 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I call for judgement on the statement: "ais523 is the Monsterkeepor." > > Arguments: > ais523 is the Mad Scientist; "Monsterkeepor" is not a rule-defined term, > and it is unclear if this is a synonym or not. If not, what should i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

Pavitra wrote: > Incidentally, it seems you had 2.2 Blots when you deregistered back in > 2005. What was that about? Does anyone still remember? What Blots were, or why e had some?

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Wednesday 10 September 2008 03:13:06 am Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) wrote: > I register myself for Agora using the nickname "Sir Toby". > > For the benefit of the Registrar, I note that I was previously > registered under the nickname "Sir Toby" and the email address > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. My current

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJs on Normish's nomichood and contracthood

2008/9/18 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I CFJ on the following: Normish is a nomic. Arguments: Normish > contains, is, or runs on a Linux server which contains a script > allowing its users to alter the server's contents arbitrarily. > Treating this as a nomic ruleset, this makes Normish a nomic. A

Re: DIS: A little tool

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:45 -0400, comex wrote: > I imported Zefram's rules_text thing and the RCS to make a little > rule-history page: > > http://agora.qoid.us/rule > > This will be more useful when I add diffs, which will be soonish. > Requires Javascript, because I'm too lazy to make it not.

DIS: A little tool

I imported Zefram's rules_text thing and the RCS to make a little rule-history page: http://agora.qoid.us/rule This will be more useful when I add diffs, which will be soonish. Requires Javascript, because I'm too lazy to make it not. Thoughts?

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ratify

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:28 -0400, comex wrote: > I intend, without objection, to ratify the Short Logical Ruleset I > most recently published. Generally speaking, I look with skeptical eyes whenever comex tries to ratify anything, but that report looks correct to me. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lumpy Caste

On Thursday 18 September 2008 03:26:07 pm Taral wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's ugly about a max function? > > Why do we need one? Edge case. Then N/k+1 rules work well for largish numbers of players, but the constant cutoffs are mor

DIS: A gift from TNP2

is now up, containing an automatically-extracted and automatically-updated list of all the most recent reports submitted by each officer, based on the email received in a-o. (Let me know if you spot bugs in it.) Hopefully this will be a useful resource for peop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lumpy Caste

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's ugly about a max function? Why do we need one? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use the power anyone has to terminate a pledge with no > dependent action required if it will never impose any obligations in its > current form (we added that rule a while ago to help clean up one-off > pledges tha

Re: DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Any contract change method defined *within the contract itself* still > > works, as R2198 is still the right power to allow that. Changing > > contracts in special rules-controlled ways that the con

Re: DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Any contract change method defined *within the contract itself* still > works, as R2198 is still the right power to allow that. Changing > contracts in special rules-controlled ways that the contract doesn't > itself specify (e.g. termination by the Notar

Re: DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:28 +0100, ais523 wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 21:07 -0400, Sgeo wrote: >>> I vote Sell Ticket (2VP) on all active proposals >>> >>> I make the following pledge >>> { >>> This is a pledge, and a public contract. >>> If a player fills

Re: DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I terminate this pledge, as it is obsolete. (It does not impose any >> future obligations on Sgeo that aren't imposed by the Vote Market >> anyway.) > By the way, does that work, or are the precedences still screwed up > around

DIS: Re: ?spam? Re: BUS: Fast automagic VP

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:28 +0100, ais523 wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 21:07 -0400, Sgeo wrote: > > I vote Sell Ticket (2VP) on all active proposals > > > > I make the following pledge > > { > > This is a pledge, and a public contract. > > If a player fills a sell ticket requiring me to vote a c