On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 21:58, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 19:12, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops. With the con
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 19:12, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Oops. With the consent of a majority of Llamas, I intend to amend the
>>> Llama Party b
On Sunday 12 October 2008 07:20:23 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> Change the title of Rule 1950 to "Voting on Senate Decisions", and
> amend it by replacing each instance of "democratic decision" with
> "Senate decision", and by prepending this paragraph:
>
> Each first-class player represents a state
Proto-Proposal: The Commonwealth of Agora
(AI = 3, please)
[I still think "ordinary" is a non-intuitive name.]
Amend Rule 2196 (Standard Classes of Agoran Decisions) to read:
An Agoran decision with an adoption index is either a House
or a Senate decision. An Agoran decision with a
Pavitra wrote:
> On Sunday 12 October 2008 02:00:39 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 1g) All communications pertaining to this contract are to be
>> posted to at least one forum of each nomic in which it is a
>> contract.
>
> This should probably specify "public forum".
>
> Also: does "are to be" mean "
On Sunday 12 October 2008 02:00:39 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> 1g) All communications pertaining to this contract are to be
> posted to at least one forum of each nomic in which it is a
> contract.
This should probably specify "public forum".
Also: does "are to be" mean "SHALL be" or "are ineffective
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a proto-amendment to the AAA: Amend 6.d. by striking "3*floor(P)"
> and inserting "2 + floor(2*P)".
I would support this.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can g
On Sunday 12 October 2008 12:05:37 am Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 17:57, Ben Caplan wrote:
> > I withdraw 3 VP for 268 chits.
>
> 281 chits, I think, and you only have 115, so I'm considering this
> to fail.
I'm pretty sure I have a bazillion chits, so this should succeed.
On Oct 12, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 12 Oct 2008, at 14:50, Ed Murphy wrote:
THE AGORAN WEEKLY JOURNAL
VOLUME 52, BACK ISSUE 4
Friday, August 31, 2007
lol wut
[[WP:DEADLINE]]
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
ehird wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2008, at 14:50, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> THE AGORAN WEEKLY JOURNAL
>> VOLUME 52, BACK ISSUE 4
>> Friday, August 31, 2007
>
> lol wut
Quiet, you.
On Oct 11, 2008, at 9:44 PM, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:36:05 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
Taral wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I harvest 869 from these crops, the power of a recently amended
rule (mutated to power 2), for 6 r
On Oct 11, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I harvest 869 from these crops, the power of a recently amended rule
(mutated to power 2), for 6 random crops. Yay for high seed ratios!
Funny how this is coming up so ofte
On 12 Oct 2008, at 14:50, Ed Murphy wrote:
THE AGORAN WEEKLY JOURNAL
VOLUME 52, BACK ISSUE 4
Friday, August 31, 2007
lol wut
--
ehird
13 matches
Mail list logo