On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 20:43, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "Make notes not annoying",
> with adoption index 2:
>
> {In Rule 2126, "Notes", remove the word "fixed" from the sentence
> "Notes are a class of fixed assets.", remove the paragraph "(5) A
>
Ninja Nomic, a nomic located on Facebook, has been inactive for quite some time.
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=7432501077
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "Make notes not annoying",
> with adoption index 2:
>
> {In Rule 2126, "Notes", remove the word "fixed" from the sentence
> "Notes are a class of fixed assets.", remove the paragraph "(5)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to test it. I am about to roll the classic 3d6; there will be no game
> actions in the roll other than a communications test.
... what do you think I did?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:20 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 16:43, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
> > "Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Mark
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 16:43, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
> "Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement
>> as follows:
>> {
>> Insert after the first sentence of section 2:
>> {
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement
> as follows:
> {
> Insert after the first sentence of section 2:
> {{
> Ownership of Vote Points is restricted to persons.
> }}
> Upon the adoption o
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 17:18, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Was Levi removed from the AFO's parties?
>>
> I believe you removed em via proposal about six months ago.
Proposal 5576 on July 4. Fixed on the wiki.
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:57, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thu 16 Oct 21:27:06 AAA amended by Pavitra
>>
>>> I intend, without 3 Objections, to amend the RBoA contract by
>>> removing the last sentence of paragraph 4. [It's obsolete now.]
>> This sentence was apparently
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 18:07 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> >
> > Gratuitous Arguments by BobTHJ:
> >
> > I'm guilty. Again, I ask for the court's mercy as I was on vacation
> > with limited internet.
>
> I am inclined to impose a nominal fine of 1 coin under the PBA. Any
> comments?
Seems rea
Gratuitous Arguments by BobTHJ:
I'm guilty. Again, I ask for the court's mercy as I was on vacation
with limited internet.
I am inclined to impose a nominal fine of 1 coin under the PBA. Any
comments?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There having been no objection, I add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-
only address
to the Business Forum. H. Distributor Taral, please let us know
when the
dice server can send
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [The change back in the great repeals of requiring consensus appeals
>> judgements was interesting, but ultimately I think it's (a) more
>> streamlined to require individual appeals membe
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [The change back in the great repeals of requiring consensus appeals
> judgements was interesting, but ultimately I think it's (a) more
> streamlined to require individual appeals member "votes" on a
> judgement with a defa
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There having been no objection, I add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address
> to the Business Forum. H. Distributor Taral, please let us know when the
> dice server can send messages.
Done, but it won't work:
Dec 8
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:36 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> All the contracts recently cleaned up were either never added, or
> "deleted" in Wikidot's default sense (i.e. renamed by prepending
> "deleted:"). However, this was never a pledge; BobTHJ simply wrote
> on November 10:
Oh, I confused it with t
ais523 wrote:
> (Note that I
> don't think the text of the pledge was reasonably available during the
> voting period, because AFAIR Murphy deleted it from eir Notary website
> when e intended to terminate it, rather than when it was terminated.)
All the contracts recently cleaned up were either
On 8 Dec 2008, at 16:10, comex wrote:
I intend, W2S, to initiate a criminal case against ehird, accusing em
of violating Rule 2215 by misleading others as to the effectiveness of
eir purported transfer of a coin to a judgement.
I replied to a-d saying that I know it doesn't work straight afte
On 8 Dec 2008, at 05:24, Roger Hicks wrote:
Fails. The PBA restricts coin ownership to members.
Yes, I'm well aware, having written that clause.
On 8 Dec 2008, at 02:09, Ed Murphy wrote:
Sun 16 Nov 00:52:20 Unnamed pledge created by ehird
I pledge not to redeem USD Vouchers specifying warrigal.
Having received no objection, I terminate this contract.
This pledge did not exist. It did not identify itself as
public.
20 matches
Mail list logo
