On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> Have you looked at the Firefox addon FireGPG?
Yeah, as mentioned by comex, it's not PGP/MIME. I don't like inline
PGP, as it clutters the view.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
>> 8xFOR. I wrote this.
>
> By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
> successfully removed the unwanted one.
Sorry, the one me
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:26 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
> > 8xFOR. I wrote this.
>
> By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
> successfully removed the unwanted one.
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 6135 O 1 1.5 comex because e is one
> 8xFOR. I wrote this.
By the way, I'm quite fine with getting Scamster again now that I've
successfully removed the unwanted one.
This may or may not be reverse psychology.
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 20:11 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >> 6137 O 0 1.0 Tiger Ambassador Anarchy
> > AGAINST (probably invalid)
>
> Why? Did I fail to use correct adoption index again?
No, because ehird probably has a voting limit of 0 on ordinary
proposals. So it's a valid prop
>> 6137 O 0 1.0 Tiger Ambassador Anarchy
> AGAINST (probably invalid)
Why? Did I fail to use correct adoption index again?
2009/3/4 comex :
> I have, and it's terrible. Messages are always signed inline (not
> with MIME or whatever) and you can't search through encrypted
> messages. Neither of these are deficiencies of FireGPG, and it's a
> nice try, but PGP is pretty hard when you don't control your mail
> client.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> Y'know, I don't think anyone's going to spoof you for Agora.
>>
>> I used to sign everything. I would still, but gmail doesn't support PGP.
>
> Have you looked at t
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 08:48 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
> > 2009/3/4 Alex Smith :
> >> I submit the following proposal (AI 3, Title="Open It Up",
> >> coauthor=Goethe):
> >> --
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Alex Smith :
>> I submit the following proposal (AI 3, Title="Open It Up",
>> coauthor=Goethe):
>> --
>>
>> Create a Rule with the following text and a power of 3:
>>
>>
2009/3/4 Alex Smith :
> I submit the following proposal (AI 3, Title="Open It Up",
> coauthor=Goethe):
> --
>
> Create a Rule with the following text and a power of 3:
>
> If a rule (other than this one) exists that mentions the
> po
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:46 +, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:06 -0800, Taral wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > ais523's "fix" is not to be trusted. Read it. "If a rule mentions
> > > the possibility... that someone can modify the rules by anno
Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Y'know, I don't think anyone's going to spoof you for Agora.
>
> I used to sign everything. I would still, but gmail doesn't support PGP.
Have you looked at the Firefox addon FireGPG?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP d
13 matches
Mail list logo
