DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2437 remanded to coppro by woggle, BobTHJ

2009-04-10 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2437a The fundamental question here is whether or not R2160 was satisfied for the purposes of the actions Goethe performed. R2160 requires 4 conditions to be met to allow a player to perform the action, and I will evalua

DIS: Re: BUS: A set of contract actions

2009-04-10 Thread Sean Hunt
Sean Hunt wrote: > I leave the PBA. > I leave Brainfuck Joust. > I grant my consent to the publicization of Vote Market II and ask Murphy > to do the same. I post a Buy Ticket for 1 Mill with an operator of - for someone to transfer me a Mill with an operator other than -.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic no longer a forum

2009-04-10 Thread Charles Reiss
On 4/10/09 10:08 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > ##nomic doesn't work for me either. Besides, Rule 478 says the > publicity of a forum can be changed by the Registrar without objection > by announcing intent to change it to that forum. But that forum is > inaccessible so this is hardly possible. I assu

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Refactor contracts

2009-04-10 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: > Publicity is a contract switch with values Private (default) > and Public. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding: I like this proposal, however, Publicity is already a forum switch.

DIS: Re: BUS: http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic no longer a forum

2009-04-10 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > Given that http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic is no longer > > accessible, it will no longer be considered a forum. > > > > -Yally > It is ##nomic, not #%23nomic. It is accessible; I am in it right now. > And you c

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election

2009-04-10 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > comex wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > >> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the > >> holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active > >> players, the vote

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6187 - 6190

2009-04-10 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Due to lack of quorum, the decisions for Proposals 6187, 6188, and >> 6190 are not resolved; instead, the voting period is doubled. > > Any chance you can repost the text of such proposals next time? I'll try to remember. Prop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election

2009-04-10 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > comex wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >>> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the >>> holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active >>> players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the option

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election

2009-04-10 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the >> holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active >> players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and >> Ya

DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election

2009-04-10 Thread comex
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the > holder of the Registrar office.  The eligible voters are the active > players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and > Yally. Aren't you the I

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6187 - 6190

2009-04-10 Thread comex
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Due to lack of quorum, the decisions for Proposals 6187, 6188, and > 6190 are not resolved; instead, the voting period is doubled. Any chance you can repost the text of such proposals next time?